Generally in a community every one will agree when asked that sexual and domestic violence are not good. The issues seem to come up when there is a specific example - an example in which people in the community know the players.
Then the stakes get high, and the conversations get uncomfortable. Think about every newspaper report of a crime in which the neighbors interviewed opine "but he was such a nice guy!"
There seems to be a serious desire to split up the good guys from the bad guys. If rape and abuse are bad, then bad guys must do them, so the fact that I know this guy and liked this guy, and had him painted as a good guy, he couldn't be doing this bad thing. Conclusion: she's lying.
What we seem to be missing in public court of opinion is that good people can do bad things, and bad people can do good things. That actually there aren't usually good and bad people, but complex people that do lots of things. Some good. Some bad. Some really, really bad.
So when I came across
this account* of a friend and a victim's complicated relationship with an abusive boyfriend, who was also a sometimes a source of strength and comfort, it resonated.
If we can hold more complex views of the victims and perpetrators of domestic and sexual violence, we can start to do away with the victim blaming, the "why didn't she leave", the "he couldn't possibly" and we can start to get real about ending violence. We can start to hold perpetrators accountable for their bad actions - even if we still think of them as good people. We can start to support survivors without minimizing their experience, their relationship with partner who was abusive, or their protective strategies while in the relationship.
*warning for language.